April 12, 2024
Engagement refers to the dialogue and influence investors exert over portfolio companies (PCs) concerning sustainability matters. Engagement serves as a way for active investors to steer portfolio companies in the 'right' direction towards increasing their sustainability-related ambitions and considerations. An engagement policy describes how shareholder engagement is integrated into the investment process, and sets practical approaches to be employed, as well as reporting and communication guidelines.
Disclosing your engagement policies is a requirement for Alternative Investment Fund Managing Directors (AIFMD) as stated in Article 3g of the European Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II).
The requirement works on a 'comply or explain' basis, and was transposed onto Dutch national law on Article 5:87c of Dutch Financial Supervision Act.
If you want to classify one of your Funds as an Article 8 or 9 product, it is not mandatory —but recommended— to set an engagement policy. Disclosing your engagement with PCs demonstrates you have a clear process for supporting your PCs in achieving the sustainability ambitions you have set for your Fund.
Even if you decide not to set up an engagement policy, these processes should be included in your sustainability risk disclosure, to showcase how you integrate sustainability risks in the investment decision-making process, and how you plan to achieve the targets you set for your Fund for the promotion of sustainability characteristics (Article 8) or for the attainment of environmental or social objectives (Article 9).
As a starting point for your firm's building of an engagement process, you must determine which companies you would like to engage with and which tools will effectively serve you to do so.
The following checklist allows you to get a comprehensive overview of the steps you need to take to ensure your engagement policies have been coherently designed.
Once you have completed going through this checklist, you should be ready to publish your engagement policy and enforce it!
Keep in mind you should be as transparent as possible in building the policy.
It should be clear why you have selected these specific methods of management or performance monitoring, and how that will bring value to the fund.
The following (non-exhaustive) list enumerates some of the most common such tools:
To determine which engagement tools are correct for your firm's specific needs, a few questions can prove helpful to determine your strategy in starting the engagement with a specific PC.
Do they share similar interests and opinions on the matter?
Collaboration in those instances can prove effective and simplify the effort needed from you as investment manager, but can only be established after careful consideration of the risks and opportunities associated therewith.
Then it might be a good idea to adopt a top-down approach.
Then, you might want to opt for setting up an initiative with more baseline employees.
When deciding who the relevant person to begin engagement with is, it is important to consider:
i) the value you place on building long-term relationships with your PCs
ii) your envisaged holding period with them.
If you want to maintain a longer relationship with a company, you should try to talk to board management and adopt an engagement policy consistent with their views.
If you decide to opt-in for the Principal Adverse Impact ('PAI') framework, you also need to disclose relevant information of these engagement policies. Engagement policies are one type of 'action to be taken' to incorporate consideration of the PAIs into the investment strategy.
Generally, this would require you to write a short chapter within your engagement policy on how you will approach:
i) the PAI data collection
ii) how the results of the PAI indicators yearly will be assessed to identify need for further engagement
iii) the process for deciding on which companies to engage with and how
iii) how frequently and using which tools you will engage with the PCs on their PAI results.
January 20, 2025
6
min read
The proposed omnibus legislation is set to merge the CSRD, CS3D and EU Taxonomy. We help you understand the potential consequences
Read moreJanuary 14, 2025
5
min read
What is greenwashing, why the SFDR sometimes fails to combat it, and what can be done to address its shortcomings?
Read moreApril 12, 2024
7
min read
The European Commission’s SFDR mandates the use of Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) indicators to assess the negative sustainability impacts.
Read more